Culture

What Abstract Expressionism Demanded of Its Audience

By Thomas Nakamura · 2024-10-20 · 7 min read
What Abstract Expressionism Demanded of Its Audience

When Jackson Pollock's drip paintings first appeared at Betty Parsons Gallery in New York in 1948, the critical establishment split between those who saw revolutionary art and those who saw an elaborate hoax. The division persists — abstract art continues to provoke accusations of charlatanism more than seventy-five years later — because abstract expressionism demands something from its audience that representational art does not: the willingness to have an experience without understanding it.

The paintings were not meant to be decoded. Pollock's Number 1A, 1948, a tangle of black, white, and aluminium paint layered over enamel on an eight-by-seventeen-foot canvas, does not represent anything. It does not symbolise chaos, energy, or the American unconscious, despite decades of criticism claiming otherwise. It is an object — a physical presence that produces effects in the viewer through scale, colour, rhythm, and material texture. The appropriate response is not interpretation but attention.

Mark Rothko's mature paintings — the floating rectangles of luminous colour that he produced from the late 1940s until his death in 1970 — were designed to produce emotional responses of a specific intensity. Rothko insisted his paintings be hung low, viewed from eighteen inches, and experienced in near-silence. Under these conditions, the paintings pulse: the edges of the colour fields appear to breathe, advancing and receding as the viewer's eye adjusts. The experience is closer to meditation than to looking.

Willem de Kooning's Woman series scandalised even the abstract expressionist community by reintroducing the figure into a movement that had declared figuration dead. The paintings' violence — slashing brushstrokes, garish colours, distorted anatomy — expressed an ambivalence toward the female body that feminist critics have justifiably interrogated. But the paintings' formal achievement — the integration of figuration and abstraction, the conversion of aggression into compositional energy — remains technically dazzling regardless of one's position on their content.

The Museum of Modern Art in New York (https://www.moma.org) holds the most comprehensive collection of abstract expressionist painting, with galleries dedicated to Pollock, Rothko, de Kooning, and their contemporaries that allow the kind of sustained, proximate viewing the work demands.

Visit a gallery containing abstract expressionist paintings and spend thirty minutes with a single work. Do not read the wall text until after you have formed your own response. The paintings demand the courage to feel before you understand — and the humility to accept that understanding may never fully arrive. That uncertainty is not the art's failure but its purpose.